What's in Imran Khan's pocket?

 People like us also endured the pain of listening to Imran Khan's entire speech but in the end only a rat came out of this mountain in the form of a piece of paper. Sometimes he would take the paper out of his pocket and sometimes he would put it back. He claimed that the paper contained evidence of conspiracy against his government but did not disclose its contents. He was waving the paper and giving the impression that a global conspiracy was being hatched against Pakistan but could not say what kind of conspiracy it was and who had hatched it. He also tried to look like Bhutto while paying tribute to Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto but like Bhutto he could not dare to say who is the conspirator and what is the reason for his anger. So now there are different rumors about this paper. Some are saying that this is a letter from the ambassadors of the European Union. Some people think that this is a document containing a summary of the sentiments of a Pakistani ambassador to a western country about Pakistan. Some are saying that these are the minutes of the meeting between the US and Pakistan's national security advisers, some are saying that these are the minutes of the talks between Pakistan and US State Department before their visit to Russia but where As far as my research is concerned, this is not a document that threatens Imran Khan from any western country or is a conspiracy to overthrow Imran Khan's government. The basis of my claim is as follows.

1: If a country has to conspire against a government or threaten a ruler, it never gives in documentary form.

2: The United States and Western countries are well aware of the political structure of Pakistan and they know that Imran Khan did nothing against their interests except using language. Therefore, there is no justification for him to overthrow his government. Waste your time

3: Relations between Pakistan and the United States have been strained. The Americans were very satisfied with Pakistan's role in the Qatar Agreement but when the Taliban against the plan occupied Kabul prematurely and the Americans and Europeans saw the scenes of Afghans falling from the planes, they blamed the Pakistani state policy on Taliban in the past. Was angry with him but not with Imran Khan's government but with the Pakistani state because American and European countries know that Imran Khan has as much role in formulating and implementing Afghan policy as Pervez Khattak's defense In matters. If they had threatened, they would have given it to the Army Chief or DG ISI. If there is any conspiracy, they will do it against the Pakistani army.

4: Meeting Trump and celebrating him in Pakistan was Imran Khan's last contact with a senior US official. Ever since Biden came, no senior US official has spoken to Imran Khan. During this time, whenever the Americans contacted the Army Chief or DG ISI. One of the high-level contacts at the civilian level was with National Security Advisor Moeed Yousaf, and after that contact, he said in an interview with me that there was no talk of intimidation or resentment and no talk of bases.

5: As far as the letter of the European ambassadors is concerned, it is a diplomatic practice. The ambassadors of each country keep writing letters to the countries concerned based on the demands of their country and those countries either respond or remain silent as per their policy. For example, our ambassador to the United States has been writing letters on various occasions asking the Americans for support on Kashmir, but the Americans disapprove of this and do not accept their demand. Thus, it is common practice in diplomacy to send such memoranda.

6: Countries that make threats do not do so in writing, but they do convey the message of their officials in direct meetings with the authorities of the country concerned, or through their embassies in that country. Threaten with action. For example, now that we know that the real target of the United States is China, has the United States threatened China with a letter? No, by continuing the dialogue with China, the United States threatened to launch its own project in response to the BRI at the G7 and NATO summits.

7: The National Security Committee is the first and foremost forum to discuss any conspiracy of any national or foreign power against the security of Pakistan and as far as I know there is no topic of any global conspiracy to remove Imran Khan in this committee till date. No discussion. If Imran Khan has any genuine evidence then why he did not bring it in the National Security Committee instead of waving it in front of the nation. Other responsible members of the National Security Committee are silent on the matter, but the Home Minister, who has crossed all boundaries in favor of Imran Khan, also says that there is no such letter or document in his notice. If Imran Khan had been a responsible Prime Minister, he would not have waved such a document in the meeting in the interest of becoming Bhutto. If they show evidence that a Western power is plotting a no-confidence motion against their government or Pakistan, I will first of all stand with them and openly demand that the opposition relinquish its no-confidence motion.

8: I consider Imran Khan's speech as a drama because he is constantly telling absolute lies of Absolutely Not. Now, if they had no record of such misrepresentations, we would still have room for suspicion