Even if the Speaker cites Article 5, the no-confidence motion cannot be rejected, Chief Justice said

 On the PPP's request to form a full court bench in the hearing of the suo motu notice case on the no-confidence issue, the Chief Justice of Pakistan remarked that even if the Speaker cites Article 5, the no-confidence motion cannot be rejected.

A five-member larger bench headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan is hearing the case. The bench comprises Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan, Justice Mazhar Alam, Justice Muneeb Akhtar and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel.

Even if the Speaker cites Article 5, the no-confidence motion cannot be rejected, Chief Justice said

The Chief Justice of Pakistan inquired whether the rolling procedure of the Deputy Speaker was a violation of the Constitution or a violation of the Constitution.

PPP lawyer Farooq Naik said that all eyes are on the Supreme Court to decide the case today.

The Chief Justice remarked that efforts are being made to decide this case as soon as possible. The court will not take any decision in the air.

Justice Ejaz-ul-Haq said that he could not decide on important constitutional issues in a hurry after which further hearing was adjourned till tomorrow.

During the hearing, PTI lawyer Babar Awan came to the rostrum and argued that the presidential reference should be heard along with the existing self notice.

Don't talk politics in front of us, Chief Justice's reply to PTI lawyer

Babar Awan said, "Record my plea. Imran Khan has allowed me to plead that we are ready to hold elections."

Lawyer Naeem Bukhari presented in the court on behalf of the Speaker and Deputy Speaker

Lawyer Naeem Bukhari said in the court that I have appeared in the court on behalf of the Speaker and Deputy Speaker. The Chief Justice said that who will give arguments on behalf of the petitioners?

PPP lawyer Farooq H Naik's request to form a full court bench

PPP lawyer Farooq H Naik said that the court should not be a burden. He asked for a full court bench.

The Chief Justice of Pakistan said that if you have any mistrust, tell us, we get up, because of a full court, there was a backlog of 1 million cases.

One full court backlog of 1 million cases, says Chief Justice of Pakistan

Farooq Naik said that the court should form a full court on an important constitutional issue. The Chief Justice said that it is the job of the court to look into the constitutional question. What is your case?

We will make a full court if needed, Chief Justice

He said that the full court held 66 hearings in one case for two years, 12,000 cases were filed due to the full court. Establishment stops other court proceedings, first state the basis of the case.

The method of removing the Prime Minister is different from removing the President, PPP lawyer

Lawyer Farooq H Naik said that Article 95 does not mention any charge or accusation against the Prime Minister. The method is different from removing the president.

Farooq Naik referred to Article 54 (3) of the Constitution in the Supreme Court and said that convening the Assembly in 14 days is a constitutional obligation.

The PPP lawyer said that no-confidence motion was entered on March 8, the National Assembly session was convened on March 25 instead of March 21. The Deputy Speaker adjourned the session till March 28 after Fateha on March 25.

Farooq Naik said that the resolution was allowed under the rules, the speaker had to convene a meeting within 14 days of the no-confidence motion, the speaker did not give any reason for not convening the meeting till the 20th after the motion was convened.

Your case is related to the action of the Speaker, Justice Jamal Mandokhel

Justice Jamal Mandokhel said that your case is related to the action of the Speaker. Can you tell me whether the Speaker did it right or wrong? Justice Muneeb Akhtar asked that there are 100 members of the Assembly. So won't the movement be rejected?

Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan remarked that no no-confidence motion can be taken unless Leo is granted a grant. What does that mean? What does it mean for a speaker to grant a grant?

What does it mean for a speaker to grant a grant? Chief Justice

Justice Muneeb Akhtar said that it was in the proceedings of the Assembly that the Speaker could reject the resolution.

Justice Muneeb Akhtar said that the government was in the majority and if it voted against the motion, no motion would ever be moved.

Does the Speaker allow a motion of no confidence in the House? Question of the Supreme Court

The court questioned whether the Speaker allows the motion of no-confidence to be moved by the House. What happens if the speaker does not allow motion?

The Chief Justice remarked that the date of April 3 was fixed instead of giving an opportunity to discuss the motion. What day did the Speaker give to discuss the no-confidence motion? How can a day of direct voting be given on a no-confidence motion?

How can the day of direct voting on no-confidence motion be given ?, Chief Justice of Pakistan

Farooq H Naik said that the Speaker did not allow discussion on the no-confidence motion. Chief Justice Umrata Bandial asked why the proceedings were adjourned. Farooq Naik referred to the agenda item and said that for the no-confidence motion on April 3